INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM & PRODUCTION
PROTAGONISTT H E   N E T W O R K
Campaign finance

ActBlue Under the Microscope, WinRed Nowhere in Sight

Kayla Dones describes how volunteers followed up on unusual donation records and argues for applying the same scrutiny to ActBlue and WinRed.

Illustration of an adding machine and ledger paper on a desk
Editorial illustration. It does not depict the events described.View 8K artwork

Following up in the field

Dones recalls coordinating volunteers who used campaign-finance filings to identify leads and then contacted people whose names appeared in the records. She describes interviews in which some donors disputed transactions attributed to them.

The same questions for both platforms

The piece uses a congressional hearing on ActBlue to ask why WinRed should face a different standard of scrutiny. That argument is Dones’s. The hearing material and linked interviews document particular proceedings and accounts, each with its own scope.

What a filing can establish

A filing records what was reported to regulators. A disputed or unusual entry is a lead that needs follow-up. Establishing whether a transaction was authorized, and who initiated it, takes further evidence.

Search the newsroom